Tarello Institute for Legal Philosophy

On debate

–
–

Thinking Like a Lawyer  &  The Artifact Theory of Law

–
–

 

This course is composed of two independent workshops on:

(1) Thinking Like a Lawyer by Frederick Schauer (Harvard UP, 2009)
(2) The Artifact Theory of Law (Eds. Burazin, Himma & Roversi, Oxford UP forthcoming)

–


THINKING LIKE A LAWYER (Harvard UP, 2009)
by Frederick Schauer

–

SchauerFrederick Schauer

–

41khxdKkVeL._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_

On debate with

Mauro Barberis (Trieste)
Pierluigi Chiassoni (Genoa)
Giovanni Battista Ratti (Genoa)
Jorge Rodriguez (Mar del Plata)

and Frederick Schauer (Virginia)

 

–

Reading material

[PDF password protected: TLLworkshop] Frederick Schauer, 2009: Thinking Like a Lawyer (Harvard UP).

[PDF] Mauro Barberis, 2016: How One Can Benefit from His Own Wrong. Schauer on Precedent, Common Law, and Law.

[PDF] Pierluigi Chiassoni, 2016: Statutory Interpretation and Other Puzzles.

[PDF] Giovanni Battista Ratti, 2016: Some Remarks on Precedent and Analogy.

[PDF] Jorge L. Rodríguez, 2016: Defeasibility and Burden of Proof.

 

THE ARTIFACT THEORY OF LAW  (Oxford UP, forthcoming in 2016)
Eds. L. Burazin, K. Himma, and C. Roversi

–

BurazinLuka RoversischauerBurazin (Zagreb)
Corrado Roversi (Bologna)
Frederick Schauer (Virginia)

 

 

–

Reading material

[PDF] Luka Burazin, 2015: Can There be an Artifact Theory of Law, forthcoming in Ratio Juris.

[PDF] Corrado Roversi, 2016: Arguments for an Artefact Theory of Law, mns.
+ Handout

The workshop materials shall be read in advance. 

–